• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • The Newspaper
  • Our Team
  • PDF Books
  • Archive
  • Gallery
  • Contact Us

Scena Criminis

L'Informazione al servizio della Legalità

  • EnglishEnglish
    • ItalianoItaliano
    • EnglishEnglish
    • EspañolEspañol
  • News & History
    • History of Crime
    • Criminal Words
    • Gender Violence
    • News
    • Organized Crime
  • Quotes, Interviews, Videos
    • Interviews
    • Quotes
    • Videos
  • Crime & Art
    • Recommended Books
    • Criminal Portraits
    • The Eye that Kills: Cinema and Crime
    • Violent Art
  • Criminal Biographies
    • Caserta: Crimes from the Past
    • Criminal Biographies
    • Most Wanted
    • Mysteries and Unsolved Crimes
    • Serial Killer
    • Snapshots from a Crime
  • Forensic Sciences
    • Criminalistics
      • Ballistics: Rifles and Guns
    • Criminology
      • Psychology
      • Sociology
    • Law
    • Nonverbal Communication
You are here: Home / Forensic Sciences / The Science of why Good People do Bad Things

The Science of why Good People do Bad Things

2 November 2014 da admin Leave a Comment

0Shares

History is replete with entire groups of people, organizations, and nations, engaging in horrific, immoral behavior, ranging from genocide, to riots and killings, to massive greed and corruption. Often, these are not the actions of individuals, but of collective groups led by a toxic leader. All too often, we point the finger at the leader as the cause of the bad behavior, but without willing followers, the destruction would never occur.

I am attending the International Leadership Association conference and listening to experts discuss good leader (and follower) behavior, and also bad leadership.

I was particularly impressed with a talk by leadership ethicist, Craig Johnson. Craig begins with the well-known fact that in our leader-centric society, we give leaders too much credit for the good that happens (perhaps explaining how/why outrageously high CEO salaries seem justified), and more than their share of the blame for the bad (often a corrupt leader is imprisoned, but the aiding followers are often not prosecuted, arguing that “I was just following orders” – what Johnson calls “displacement of responsibility”).

In many of these cases, the leaders and followers are not initially bad or corrupt people. Johnson argues that processes occur that allow leaders and followers to disengage their moral reasoning and principals, and justify their bad behavior.

He starts with the assertion that people believe we are more moral than we actually are, but the process of moral disengagement leads us to act immorally, and justify our bad behavior.

Justification of bad behavior occurs in a variety of ways. First, we begin to focus on desired outcomes, and rationalize the means to achieve them. If an outcome is important, we begin to believe that the “ends justify the means.” For example, the torturing of suspected terrorists (i.e., waterboarding), is justified because of the desired outcome of protecting citizens from terrorist attacks. ISIS also uses the same process to justify the killing of Westerners as an “acceptable” means of achieving their ends. This “deactivation of moral standards,” as Craig Johnson calls it, is a slippery slope that leads only to increases in bad behavior.

Another way, according to Johnson, that we justify immoral behavior is through using “euphemistic language.” So, killed or injured civilians in bombing or drone attacks are referred to as “collateral damage.” Likewise, it is easier to imprison or execute a journalist or tourist if the governmentlabels the person a “subversive” or a “spy.”

Another means by which people justify their bad behavior is through “advantageous comparisons.” They downplay their own bad behavior by comparing it to the even worse behavior by others (“sure I stole a small amount of money, but my boss really took the company for big bucks.”).

Often, people behave badly through diffusion of responsibility. This explains crowd behavior, such as looting during riots (“everybody was doing it”), or hazing behavior (“it’s a tradition, and I was hazed when I was a newcomer”).

Bad behavior also occurs, and our moral reasoning fails us, through devaluing of the victims (“they started it”; “they deserved it”). Processes such as these lead to an escalation of violence (“he pulled out a knife, so I pulled out my gun”).

What is the antidote to moral disengagement? The key is to take personal responsibility for our actions and being alert to the dangers of moral disengagement,

Craig Johnson offers these strategies and questions:

• When others try to encourage you to bad behavior (“the dark side”) realize that you are an independent agent, and that you have a personal responsibility to behave morally.

• Step back and ask yourself, would I normally consider this action to be wrong?

• Does my language hide what is really going on?

• Who am I comparing myself to and am I making this comparison to excuse my behavior?

• Am I excusing the harm I am doing by blaming others?

• Am I blaming the victim to excuse my harmful actions?

Source: Psychology Today

Author: Ronald E. Riggio, Ph.D., Professor of Leadership and Organizational Psychology at Claremont McKenna College

Related posts:

Bullying may have long-term Health Consequences
For Families touched by Homicide, the Media prolongs Pain
Saint Sebastian - Gerrit van Honthorst
Have We Sacrificed Security For Liberty?
0Shares

Filed Under: Criminology, Forensic Sciences

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Make a donation to support our activities

Stay updated in real time

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Loading

Follow us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Search

Safe and prudent use of Internet

Categorie Articoli

Last Articles

Info

  • Business Contacts
  • Disclaimer

Tags

America american most wanted art artist Chicago crime crimen crime scene criminal Criminalistics crimine criminology CSI disorder Dna fbi forensics forensic science homicide killer law most wanted Murder Nonverbal Communication oil on canvas painting police prison psicólogia psychology psychology today research reward scena criminis science serial killer sex sex offender terrorism terrorist united states US USA violence violent art

Footer

Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy

Scene Criminis aims to bring together – around a “round table” – experts, students and simple onlookers, who want to confront, update and find new stimuli.

The largest Italian Community on Forensic Sciences that collects news, studies, curiosities and contributions on Criminology, Criminalistics, Crime Report and Law.

Scena Criminis is also a Non-profit Association, active throughout the province of Caserta (Italy), which has 3 fundamental purposes: Defense of Legality, Fight against all forms of Violence, Education to Gender Differences.

Follow us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Instagram

scenacriminis

Gli è andata male... 👮‍♂️ Gli è andata male... 👮‍♂️
Seguimi ➡️ scenacriminis.com 💪 Seguimi ➡️ scenacriminis.com 💪
➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️ ➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️
➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️ ➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️
Falso allarme... 🤦‍♂️ ➡️ www.scenacr Falso allarme... 🤦‍♂️

➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️
Altro che Jackie Chan! 😆 Altro che Jackie Chan! 😆
➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️ ➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️
➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️ ➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️
➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️ ➡️ www.scenacriminis.com ⬅️
Carica altro… Segui su Instagram

Copyright Scena Criminis Testata giornalistica registrata presso il Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere (CE) n. 849 del 26/04/2016 © 2023 ·

Direttore Responsabile: Gianfrancesco Coppo

Created by BDM | Log in